Miyu Nakashima vs Bela Tamhankar Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 10 Nov at 09:26 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Nakashima vs B. Tamhankar

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

IND
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nakashima 1 - 0 Tamhankar
They have played 2 sets in total, with Miyu Nakashima winning 2 and Bela Tamhankar winning 0. The last match between Miyu Nakashima and Bela Tamhankar was at the W15 Hua Hin, 11-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Miyu Nakashima getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nakashima | 1 |
| Tamhankar | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Hua Hin(11-11-25)
M. Nakashima vs B. Tamhankar H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 52.25% (58-53) | Career Total W/L | 36.67% (33-57) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Nakashima vs B. Tamhankar Match Preview:
- How do their second serve performances compare? Miyu Nakashima has been more effective, winning 36.87% of second serve points compared to Bela Tamhankar's 31.34% over the past six months.
- In terms of returning second serves, Bela Tamhankar slightly edges out with 51.05% success versus Miyu Nakashima's 50.14%.
- When it comes to first serve returns, Bela Tamhankar is slightly ahead, winning 37.14% of points compared to Nakashima’s 36.02%.
- Under pressure, Tamhankar has been more resilient, saving 47.01% of breakpoints, while Nakashima has saved 42.14%.
- Looking at overall performance, Nakashima has a better win rate, securing 58.33% of matches in the last year compared to Tamhankar's 34.62%.
- What's their best surface? Both players have the best career win percentage on Hard courts, winning 54% of their matches.
- In tournament levels, Miyu Nakashima shows greater success, winning 60.87% of matches in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, compared to Tamhankar’s 35.00%.
- Though Nakashima faced opponents with an average rank of 250.37, Tamhankar took on tougher competitors with an average rank of 66.85.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Tamhankar has historically excelled, winning 67% of such sets, while Nakashima has won 50%.
- In terms of break point conversion, Tamhankar is more efficient, converting 49.32% of chances compared to Nakashima’s 40.74%.
Editorial Prediction (November 10, 2025, UTC):
Miyu Nakashima has shown a stronger overall match performance over the last year, with a significantly higher win percentage than Bela Tamhankar. This suggests a consistency in Nakashima's game that might give her an edge in the upcoming match.
Tamhankar, however, displays resilience under pressure with a higher rate of saving breakpoints and converting break opportunities. These factors could prove crucial in a tightly contested match.
Considering all factors, including Nakashima's higher level of success in Futures/Satellites/ITF events, she appears more likely to clinch victory against Tamhankar in their upcoming encounter.
Miyu Nakashima vs Bela Tamhankar Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Nakashima vs B. Tamhankar H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:4:14 | Average Match Time | 1:4:14 |
| 56% (23/41) | 1st Serve % | 57% (20/35) |
| 74% (17/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (10/20) |
| 56% (10/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/15) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 71% (25/35) | Return Points Win % | 34% (14/41) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Nakashima Recent Matches Played
B. Tamhankar Recent Matches Played

M. Nakashima vs B. Tamhankar Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 52.25% (58/53) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.67% (33/57) |
| 51.87% (125/116) | Sets Win/Loss | 37.44% (73/122) |
| 51.98% (1117/1032) | Games Win/Loss | 43.72% (790/1017) |
| 53.76% (50/43) | Hard Win/Loss | 40.85% (29/42) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 18.75% (3/13) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Indoor Hard W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 0.02 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 20 | Aces Total | 37 |
| 0.07 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 75 | Total Double Faults | 174 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 303.24 | Average Opponent Rank | 119.08 |
| 64% (1400/2187) | 1st Serve % | 66% (2062/3117) |
| 56% (777/1400) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (1100/2062) |
| 43% (338/787) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (427/1055) |
| 48% (137/283) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (156/353) |
| 45% (1025/2285) | Return Points Win % | 43% (1377/3177) |
| 40.63% (13/19) | Challenger W/L | 30.77% (8/18) |
| 56.96% (45/34) | Futures W/L | 39.06% (25/39) |
| 52% (57/110) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (33/89) |
| 50% (4/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (8/14) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (9/16) |
| 92% (59/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (34/29) |
| 8% (59/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (34/5) |
| 8% (52/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (56/4) |